Generative
Syntax—Following the Yellow Brick Road to Athens
In the aftermath of Eurovision, and as a way of coping with
the usual (though short-lived) withdrawal symptoms, I find myself fantasizing
up a comparison between the upcoming Athens event on the future of Generative
Syntax, and the Eurovision Song Contest.
The comparison was prompted by musing over the different
positions and stances taken by the participants in their written statements in advance of the
event. I am struck by the differences in
tone and emphasis--- optimism vs. grumpiness when it comes to our own present
achievements and research goals; bravado vs. caution and practicality when it
comes to the outside world. These
threads run through the different contributions in different proportions, and
with respect to different topics. I
find myself both agreeing and disagreeing with things in all of these written
statements, and swithering between optimism and despondency in equal measure. I wonder what kind of conversations there will
be, and what kind of common ground there will actually be when we all meet face
to face. For this is not obvious to me
at all. All of these smart,
experienced, passionate linguists! At
the end of the event, what kind of song
will we choose when all the conversations are over, and the time has come to vote?
1.Upbeat catchy dance tune (We agree to list our
achievements and reaffirm the rightness of what we are doing, and come up with
practical suggestions for explaining how great we are to the outside world)
2.Soul searching mournful
ballad of unrequited love (Where did it all go wrong? Why are we so
misunderstood? How can we do good science if we can’t even agree what good
science is among us?)
3. Power ballad of the `I am Woman/Bearded-woman/Alternative
–Hear-me-Roar’ variety (A bit like 1,
but less conciliatory)
4. Or will the song that emerges be a watered down
compromise statement that nobody really loves but was a kind of lowest common denominator of
things that no one violently disagrees with. (Think Ireland in 1990s Eurovision).
Facetiousness aside, I for one hope for a plurality of
voices and a lot of Listening. I have
always liked working within a field such as Generative Linguistics where there
is not yet a rigid framework or doctrinaire theory that one has to follow.
I hope Athens will make the conversation
more open, and ideologies less rigid. In Eurovision, all the countries
eventually went over to singing in English, pushing out all the other
languages. I think Generative Syntax
has to go in the other direction, and old fixed genres and domains need to
cross over, mix and creatively relook at old problems with new eyes, instead of
hunkering down in their old corners.
Let’s see how it goes.
Interesting musings! Two things spring to mind.
ReplyDeleteFrank Richter und Wolfgang Sternefeld (2012) "Review of Stefan Müller: Grammatiktheorie'' Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 31-2, 263-292.
This paper is in German, but interesting reading. They basically sound the death knell on syntactic theory. When science is done in "bad taste", it is time to stop. I was not dragged down by their pessimism, since they didn't really consider the LFG perspective.
Other thing. When I go teach in far flung places where they have never heard of colorless green ideas, I tend to use these two books by Paul Kroeger.
Kroeger, Paul R. 2005. Analyzing grammar: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kroeger, Paul R. 2004. Analyzing syntax: A lexical-functional approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
I think they are a model example of transporting syntactic insights that the field as a whole has had, without overloading students with theory-particular terminology/ideals.